How many upsets should I pick in my March Madness bracket?

In the first round alone, there are typically 5-8 upsets where a lower-seeded team beats a higher seed. Picking 6-7 first-round upsets is historically optimal. However, pool strategy matters: in small pools (under 25 entries), play it safe with 4-5 upsets. In large pools (100+ entries), pick 8-9 upsets to differentiate your bracket from the crowd.

10 Data-Driven March Madness Bracket Tips for 2026

Every March, roughly 60 million Americans fill out a bracket. The vast majority are busted by Saturday. Not because they picked the wrong champion, but because they made the same predictable mistakes everyone else makes. They picked with their heart instead of the data. They overvalued name brands. They underestimated mid-majors. They treated a 64-team single-elimination tournament like a regular-season power ranking.

These 10 tips are not opinions. They are patterns extracted from four decades of tournament data. Our NCAAB prediction models use these exact principles, and they consistently outperform public bracket pools. Here is what the data says you should actually do.

Tip 1: Always Pick at Least One 12-Over-5 Upset

This is the most reliable upset in tournament history. Since 1985, at least one 12-seed has beaten a 5-seed in 29 of 35 tournaments. The overall win rate for 12-seeds against 5-seeds is approximately 35%. That is not a fluke — it is a structural feature of the seeding process. Five-seeds are often overconfident mid-major champions or bubble teams from power conferences. Twelve-seeds are frequently hot teams from solid conferences that ran through their league tournament.

The key is identifying which 12-seed has the best profile. Look for 12-seeds with top-50 adjusted defensive efficiency, experienced guards (juniors and seniors), and a winning record in games decided by 5 points or fewer. These teams know how to win ugly, and ugly wins are the currency of March.

Tip 2: Do Not Pick All Four 1-Seeds in the Final Four

It has happened exactly once since the tournament expanded to 64 teams: in 2008. On average, 1.6 of the four 1-seeds make the Final Four each year. That means at least two 1-seeds lose before the final weekend more often than not. The data-optimal strategy is to pick two 1-seeds and two lower seeds (typically 2 or 3-seeds) for your Final Four.

To identify the vulnerable 1-seed, check three things: free throw percentage below 73%, a loss in their conference tournament, or a bracket draw that puts them against a 4 or 5-seed with elite defensive efficiency in the Sweet Sixteen. One of the four 1-seeds will have at least one of these red flags every year.

Tip 3: Prioritize Defensive Efficiency Over Offensive Firepower

Offense sells tickets. Defense wins tournaments. Since 2002, teams with a top-20 adjusted defensive efficiency have reached the Sweet Sixteen at nearly double the rate of teams outside the top 50. The reason is consistency: a great offense can go cold for a half. A great defense shows up every game because it is built on effort, scheme, and communication — not whether shots are falling.

When your bracket comes down to a toss-up between two teams, pick the better defensive team. This single rule would have improved the average bracket by 3-4 correct picks per year over the last decade according to our March Madness predictions guide.

Tip 4: Trust Recent Form Over Season-Long Records

A team that went 28-3 but lost three of their last five games is a worse tournament bet than a team that went 23-8 but won ten straight heading into March. The data strongly supports weighting February and early March performance more heavily than November and December results. Our AI model weights the last 10 games at roughly 2x the importance of the first 20 games of the season.

Check each team's record over their last 10 games. Teams that are 8-2 or better over that stretch advance at a significantly higher rate than their seed would predict. Teams on a slide (5-5 or worse in their last 10) are prime upset candidates regardless of seed.

Tip 5: Free Throw Shooting Wins Close Tournament Games

Over 60% of NCAA tournament games are decided by single digits. In those close games, free throw shooting is the difference between advancing and going home. Since 2010, teams shooting above 75% from the free throw line have won 59% of tournament games decided by 6 points or fewer. Teams below 68% have won only 38% of those same game types.

This is especially important for mid-major upset picks. A 12-seed with 77% free throw shooting and strong defense is a far better upset pick than a 12-seed that shoots 66% from the line but scores more points per game. Points per game is noise in the tournament. Free throw percentage is signal.

Tip 6: Ignore Conference Bias — Evaluate Teams Individually

Every year, pundits declare one conference "the best" and assume all its teams will perform well. This is lazy analysis and the data does not support it. In 2023, the Big Ten sent nine teams and only one reached the Sweet Sixteen. In 2024, the SEC's depth was supposed to dominate, and multiple SEC teams lost in the first round.

Conference strength matters for seeding, but once the bracket is set, every game is a one-on-one matchup. Evaluate each matchup on its own merits: defensive efficiency, turnover margin, free throw shooting, and recent form. Do not give a team bonus points simply because they played in a tough conference.

Tip 7: The 8-9 Game Is a Coin Flip — Pick the Better Defensive Team

The 8 vs 9 matchup is historically the closest in the tournament, with 8-seeds winning approximately 51% of the time. It is essentially a coin flip. But here is the twist: the winner of the 8-9 game faces the 1-seed in the second round, so this pick matters for your bracket integrity beyond the first round.

When picking 8-9 games, default to the team with better adjusted defensive efficiency. They are more likely to keep the game close against the 1-seed, and in a toss-up first-round matchup, defense is the tiebreaker the data supports.

Tip 8: Mid-Majors With Tournament Experience Are Dangerous

First-time tournament teams from mid-major conferences historically underperform. They are overwhelmed by the atmosphere, the opponent quality jump, and the intensity of single-elimination pressure. But mid-major teams with returning players who have previous tournament experience are a different story entirely.

Gonzaga has been doing this for decades: returning players who know what March feels like. But it is not just Gonzaga. Any mid-major with juniors or seniors who played in the tournament the previous year outperforms first-timers by a significant margin. Check rosters for tournament experience before making upset picks.

Tip 9: Pace of Play Matters — Slow Teams Control Variance

In a single-elimination tournament, variance is the great equalizer. A team that plays at a fast pace creates more possessions, which means more opportunities for randomness to influence the outcome. A team that slows the game down reduces the total possessions, tightens the score, and makes each possession matter more. This benefits the better-coached, more-disciplined team.

Look at adjusted tempo. Teams in the bottom third of tempo (slowest pace) that also have top-50 defensive efficiency are the most dangerous upset candidates in the tournament. They turn every game into a 55-52 grind, and in that type of game, the higher seed's talent advantage shrinks dramatically.

Tip 10: Use AI to Challenge Your Gut, Not Replace It

The best bracket strategy combines data and intuition. Use AI predictions and these data-driven tips to build your baseline bracket. Then look for spots where your knowledge adds value that the model might miss: a coaching change the AI has not fully processed, an injury that happened after the data cutoff, or a rivalry dynamic that does not show up in statistics.

Where your gut and the data agree, be confident. Where they disagree, lean toward the data — it has a better long-term track record than anyone's instincts. Our NCAAB prediction models are designed to give you that data-driven baseline.

Putting It All Together: Your 2026 Bracket Checklist

Pick 1-2 twelve-over-five upsets — target 12-seeds with top-50 defensive efficiency and experienced guards.
Limit 1-seeds in Final Four to 2 — find the vulnerable 1-seed using free throw percentage and bracket draw analysis.
Default to defense in toss-ups — adjusted defensive efficiency is the tiebreaker that works.
Weight recent form heavily — last 10 games matter more than overall record.
Check free throw percentage — above 75% is a green flag; below 68% is a red flag.
Cross-reference with AI picks — validate your bracket against model predictions before submitting.

Get AI-Powered Bracket Picks for 99 Cents

Our March Madness AI model uses every principle in this article — defensive efficiency, recent form, free throw shooting, tournament experience, and pace analysis — to generate predictions for every game. Most bracket prediction tools charge $30-$50. We charge 99 cents, once, forever.

Browse All 99¢ Prediction Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best seed to pick for upsets in March Madness?

The 12-seed vs 5-seed matchup is historically the most reliable upset. Since 1985, 12-seeds have beaten 5-seeds approximately 35% of the time. At least one 12-over-5 upset has occurred in 29 of the last 35 tournaments. The 11-seed vs 6-seed matchup is also strong, with 11-seeds winning roughly 37% of the time.

Should I always pick all four 1-seeds to reach the Final Four?

No. All four 1-seeds reaching the Final Four has happened only once (2008) since 1985. On average, 1.6 of the four 1-seeds make the Final Four each year. Picking two 1-seeds and two lower seeds for your Final Four gives you the best statistical chance.

How many upsets should I pick in my bracket?

In the first round, there are typically 5-8 upsets. Picking 6-7 first-round upsets is historically optimal. In small pools (under 25 entries), play safer with 4-5 upsets. In large pools (100+ entries), differentiate with 8-9 upsets.

Does defensive efficiency really predict March Madness success?

Yes. Adjusted defensive efficiency is the single most predictive metric for tournament advancement. Since 2002, teams with top-20 adjusted defensive efficiency have reached the Sweet Sixteen at nearly double the rate of teams outside the top 50.

Keep Reading

Disclaimer: The 99¢ Community provides tools for entertainment and educational purposes only. AI predictions are based on statistical models and historical data. No prediction service can guarantee wins. Please gamble responsibly.